It’s been
quite a while since the last post. A combination of improved weather to catch up
on farming activities, taking some time off, and a couple repair projects are
to blame. Before rolling up our sleeves on the MidAmerican property tax issue, let’s
try to get back into the swing of things…
Since the blog
is taking its summer vacation, tonight we start off with beer. My interweb surfing
found an article by Deena
Shanker about how sustainable the liquor you enjoy is, including the generated
co2 estimate of your favorite beverage. Since I am enjoying an ale from my
solar powered fridge, I’ll include a link to the brewer, Sierra Nevada. I have been a fan of their product line for
years( free endorsement) , but was very pleased when a friend related to me 2
years back that the brewery generates their own electricity onsite (more free endorsement).
As you can see from their sustainability
page, the brewery is powered by a massive solar array, along with 4 fuel
cells that also capture heat for onsite use. The webpage has nifty real time
output meters of the fuel cells and solar array. The system is grid tied, but
the brewery evidently is also able to “island”, and operate independent of the
grid. My friend tells me that a winter storm caused most of Chico CA to lose electricity, while the brewery continued making their great domestic beer. Kind of makes
you actually want to say - Merica!
In the world
of coal, I have long ago stopped keeping track of people with ties to that industry claiming renewable energy receives market distorting subsidies. This
summer, a number of articles have surfaced that makes me wonder when king coal will
give up their long embedded tax payer funded incentives to lead by example.
Enviros always point out that coal price doesn’t reflect the environmental and health
impacts the fuel causes, In short, the tax payer picks up the tab. Since that point hasn’t moved public opinion to
support stable renewable energy policy in the U.S. , lets continue with some
items I found recently. The first - Coal
companies routinely win ‘competitive bids’ against no competition -
prompted a review by the GAO
since the government controls a lot of land with coal under it. A quote from
the first link “The government’s
longtime practice of auctioning coal mining rights to a single bidder may have
cost taxpayers as much as $28.9 billion over the past 30 years.”
Also , the article links to David Roberts @Grist, who also “wrote
about a similarly sweet deal in March, in which Peabody — the sole bidder
on a large seam — paid the government $1.11 per ton for coal they could sell to
China at $123 a ton. “
A lot of my
electric provider’s generation comes from the Powder River basin. Their
power is some of the highest priced electricity in Iowa, I wonder what they would
charge if they were paying full market value. Since economic logic seems to be suspended
when we jump on the king coal crazy
train , why don’t our elected officials and policy advocates head us in a better direction? David Roberts also has advice for climate
hawks and renewable energy backers in Why
coal has a hit on “America’s Got Talent”. The environmental community hasn’t moved
public opinon enough for decent renewable energy policy in “merica”, and David offers
quotes like the following to stimulate some thought - “Democrats promise the working class policies
that will help them adapt to change — education and job training and a safety
net. Republicans promise to stand athwart history and prevent further losses.
It’s not about the policies, it’s about the stories, stories of a nobler past
and the interlopers degrading or destroying it. Such stories have always had
great power.
Democrats, or at least liberals, and
especially climate hawks, are fated to forever be pushing the new, promising
the future, projecting what could be. It’s an intrinsically weaker position and
highlights the great need for creativity and storytelling.”
I’ve tried
to tell the Iowa and Midwest climate hawks that encouraging widespread local ownership
in wind and solar is the way to build support for climate policy, so far, with
little success. As Marty McFly said in BACK
TO THE FUTURE – “I guess you guys
aren’t ready for that yet, but your kids are gonna love it!”
Roberts also
finishes by quoting Machiavelli , who offered advice for us all.
“It ought to be remembered that there
is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more
uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new
order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done
well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have
the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not
readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment